EFCOG Best Practice #32
PDF Version
Title: Reducing Time and Cost
through use of a General Storm Water
Pollution Prevention
Plan for Construction Activities (3/02/05)
FACILITY:
DOE/NNSA:
Pantex Plant
POINT OF CONTACT:
D. David
McBride, 806-477-4874,
dmcbride@pantex.com
Brief Description of Best Practice:
Any construction project that will result in
disturbance of more than 1 acre is required to develop and implement a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3), by state regulation in Texas. Pantex
has developed an SWP3 that is used for all impacted construction projects at the
site. The SWP3 identifies acceptable control measures, reporting and record
keeping requirements, and provides for continued coverage of the project area
upon release of the construction contractor until the permit’s coverage may be
terminated.
Why the Best Practice was used:
Construction projects are time-critical
activities. The SWP3 was a relatively new requirement that many contractors
needed support to develop; especially when they were from outside the local area
and thus were not familiar with the weather patterns of the Texas Panhandle
(i.e. localized high-intensity storms, frequently of short duration). SWP3s had
to be developed and certified by senior management of the firms that were
implementing them (e.g., general contractors and sub-contractors).
Additionally, permit coverage needed to continue after release of the
contractor/subcontractor (i.e., until the disturbed site had achieved a
perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of the native background
species). The SWP3 thus had to be certified by the site operator (BWXT Pantex
L.L.C.).
Contractors are provided with a General SWP3
that has been developed and certified by BWXT management. The contractor uses a
pre-formatted addendum to the General Plan to adapt the plan meet their specific
project’s scope, location, and methodology. After the contractor’s management
has certified the plan, it is then reviewed, returned for modification if
necessary, and then certified by BWXT management. Upon completion of
signatures, all parties to the plan may submit separate Notifications of Intent
(NOI) to the state; construction may begin 48 hours after the submittal of an
NOI).
What are the benefits of the Best Practice:
-
It ensures consistency in SWP3s from
project to project;
-
It expedites the plan development process
by the contractor, reducing the pre-start paperwork;
-
It facilitates the review and approval of
contractor-developed SWP3;
-
It assures that contractors utilize
control measures and techniques that have been found to be effective and
appropriate to the Texas Panhandle and specifically to the Pantex Plant area;
-
It allows the contractor and BWXT to
‘share’ a common SWP3 so that when BWXT releases the contractor (takes
Beneficial Occupancy of the construction area), the SWP3 is already in place;
- Facilitated training of construction site inspectors,
project engineers and project managers on their responsibilities in meeting
the regulatory requirements.
What problems/issues were associated with the Best Practice:
After the general SWP3 was developed,
getting contractors to use the plans, rather than prepare separate, project
specific plans was overcome by making use of the prepared plan, with
project-specific-developed addenda, a contractual requirement. Pantex uses a
series of general specifications in developing contracts for construction; once
the specification was modified, making use of the general SWP3 a requirement,
this problem ended.
How the success of the Best Practice was measured:
Time to review and approve a contractor’s
SWP3 went from several weeks (nearly 6 weeks on one project) before
implementation of the general plan to approval by both BWXT and the contractor(s)
in less than one week. Prior to the implementation of the general SWP3, there
could be numerous iterations on plans between the contractor and regulatory
compliance staff. This led to delays in start of construction activities while
contractor’s plans were revised, re-submitted, reviewed and approved. Having an
SWP3 in place has assisted site contractors in preparing, submitting and
complying with the regulatory requirements.
An additional success is that BWXT is better
positioned to assume the required inspection duties and evaluate the discharge
control measures by having a pre-determined set of measures authorized for use
at the plant.
Description of process experience using the Best Practice:
Use of the General Plan has been a
contractual requirement for several years and over 20 projects have been started
using the General Plan, with project-specific addenda.
ISM Core Function and Guiding Principle to which the Best Practice relates
| Core Function 1: Define Scope of Work |
Principle 2: Clear
Roles and Responsibilities |
| Core Function 3: Develop and Implement Hazard Controls; |
Principle 5: Identification of Safety Standards and
Requirements;
Principle 6: Hazard Controls Tailored to Work Being
Performed. |
| Core Function 4: Perform Work Within Controls; |
Principle 7: Operations Authorization |