|
Hazard Analysis Excellence Document Outline
Table of Contents
Overview (CH2M Hill - Hanford)
- Define scope of work (WSRC)
- Clearly defined scope of work
- Detailed Task Breakdown
- Tools, materials, equipment, personnel, procedures, etc.
- Location
- Operational impact screening
- Walk down with employee/SME involvement
- Work method
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element
Defining tasks:
- The right task definition level is identified when it is known:
- What tools or equipment are being used
- How the tools or equipment are being used
- Where the tools or equipment are being used
- The hazards cannot be identified until the tasks are identified
Identify Hazards (LLNL)
- Define a consistent method for hazard identification
- Apply rigor of hazard identification commensurate with risk. Provide a methodology to allow a graded approach to control the work in a safe and efficient manner
- SME involvement
- Work Authorization (facility hazards)
- Define and bound "what if" scenarios (contingency planning). Identify and analyze the hazards with the work and the work environment; including predictable undesirable events commensurate with the significance of the work activity.
- Training (Identify Trainees)
- Facilitating
- Human performance
- Out of box thinking
- BBS
- Classifying Hazards
- Hazard Pre-screening
- Complex vs. Simple
- How to identify risk
- Operational impact screening
- Feed Back/Lessons Learned
- Draw upon feed back/lessons learned from previous performances (in house and Complex wide)
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element
Hazard Controls (Fluor Hanford)
- Hierarchy of controls
- Remove, Engineer, Administrate, PPE
- Focus on eliminating or reducing the hazards; for remaining hazards use a hierarchy of controls (i.e. engineered controls first, administrative controls second, and PPE last.)
- Apply rigor of hazard analysis and control assignment commensurate with risk. Provide a methodology to allow a graded approach to control the work in a safe and efficient manner
- SME involvement
- Work Authorization (facility hazards)
- Select controls and method of implementation to mitigate hazards
- Address evaluation of Conflicting Controls (e.g. IH vs. RadCon requirements)
- Evaluate introduction of new hazards while implementing controls
- How do we deal with Training and credit for Skill of Craft
- Dealing with hazard analysis for day to day jobs
- Skills based activities
- Verbal work packages
- Take credit for common sense - dark, trips, etc
- Marriage of Hazard Analysis to work instructions
- Assignment of controls to the work step
- How to determine which controls (conscience decision) need to be included in the work package
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element
Perform Work (Pantex)
- Worker analysis of jobs (pre job walk down) prior to work (BBS)
- How to deal with hazards due to unexpected conditions (Time Out)
- Considering current facility conditions and validity of hazard analysis prior to authorizing/commencing work
- How to ensure controls are in place prior to commencing work (either through method of implementation or validation)
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element
Feedback (WSRC)
- How to use feedback through the entire hazard analysis process
- Focus on improvement and draw upon effective practices
- Share amongst sites
- Success of controls
- How can job be done better
- How do we make the hazard analysis process better
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element
All (Y-12)
- Employee Involvement
- Documentation of hazard analysis
- Include hazard analysis as part of technical training
- Review/approval requirements (Graded approach)
- Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

|