Hazard Analysis Excellence Document Outline

Table of Contents

Overview (CH2M Hill - Hanford)

  • Define scope of work (WSRC)
    • Clearly defined scope of work
  • Detailed Task Breakdown
  • Tools, materials, equipment, personnel, procedures, etc.
  • Location
    • Operational impact screening
    • Walk down with employee/SME involvement
  • Work method
    • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

Defining tasks:

  • The right task definition level is identified when it is known:
    • What tools or equipment are being used
    • How the tools or equipment are being used
    • Where the tools or equipment are being used
  • The hazards cannot be identified until the tasks are identified

Identify Hazards (LLNL)

  • Define a consistent method for hazard identification
  • Apply rigor of hazard identification commensurate with risk. Provide a methodology to allow a graded approach to control the work in a safe and efficient manner
    • SME involvement
    • Work Authorization (facility hazards)
  • Define and bound "what if" scenarios (contingency planning). Identify and analyze the hazards with the work and the work environment; including predictable undesirable events commensurate with the significance of the work activity.
  • Training (Identify Trainees)
    • Facilitating
    • Human performance
    • Out of box thinking
    • BBS
  • Classifying Hazards
  • Hazard Pre-screening
  • Complex vs. Simple
  • How to identify risk
    • Attributes
  • Operational impact screening
  • Feed Back/Lessons Learned
    • Draw upon feed back/lessons learned from previous performances (in house and Complex wide)
  • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

Hazard Controls (Fluor Hanford)

  • Hierarchy of controls
    • Remove, Engineer, Administrate, PPE
  • Focus on eliminating or reducing the hazards; for remaining hazards use a hierarchy of controls (i.e. engineered controls first, administrative controls second, and PPE last.)
  • Apply rigor of hazard analysis and control assignment commensurate with risk. Provide a methodology to allow a graded approach to control the work in a safe and efficient manner
    • SME involvement
    • Work Authorization (facility hazards)
  • Select controls and method of implementation to mitigate hazards
  • Address evaluation of Conflicting Controls (e.g. IH vs. RadCon requirements)
  • Evaluate introduction of new hazards while implementing controls
  • How do we deal with Training and credit for Skill of Craft
    • Dealing with hazard analysis for day to day jobs
    • Skills based activities
    • Verbal work packages
    • Take credit for common sense - dark, trips, etc
  • Marriage of Hazard Analysis to work instructions
    • Assignment of controls to the work step
    • How to determine which controls (conscience decision) need to be included in the work package
  • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

Perform Work (Pantex)

  • Worker analysis of jobs (pre job walk down) prior to work (BBS)
  • How to deal with hazards due to unexpected conditions (Time Out)
  • Considering current facility conditions and validity of hazard analysis prior to authorizing/commencing work
  • How to ensure controls are in place prior to commencing work (either through method of implementation or validation)
  • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

Feedback (WSRC)

  • How to use feedback through the entire hazard analysis process
  • Focus on improvement and draw upon effective practices
  • Share amongst sites
  • Success of controls
  • How can job be done better
  • How do we make the hazard analysis process better
  • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element

All (Y-12)

  • Employee Involvement
  • Documentation of hazard analysis
  • Include hazard analysis as part of technical training
  • Review/approval requirements (Graded approach)
  • Develop Lines of Inquiry (assessment criteria) for this element